Administrat of e-Publishing and Marketing Services

  « Exit from preview

Judicial Power and National Politics:Courts and Gender in the Religious-Secular Conflict in Israel



 View book pages:
» About this Book
    Judicial Power and National Politics
    Contents
    Illustrations
    Introduction
    1. Judicial Community, Judicial Power, and National Politics
    2. The Israel High Court of Justice and Religious Authorities
    3. The Irony of State Incorporation
    4. Social Movement Lawyers,Judicial Community, and the Countermovement that Binds Them
    5. Changing Visions, Conflicting Missions: Signaling the Judicial Community
    6. Social Movements andChanging Language of the Court: Implicit Alliances and Explicit Coalitions
    7. Conclusions: Religion and Gender in National Courts:Suggestions for Further Research
    Notes
    Bibliography
 
+
Index
    Page 
 

 Buy this book:
  SUNY Press
  




 Judicial Power and National Politics:Courts and Gender in the Religious-Secular Conflict in Israel
by Patricia J. Woods
    Feedback  Available purchase options     AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Bibliographic information

TitleJudicial Power and National Politics:Courts and Gender in the Religious-Secular Conflict in Israel
AuthorPatricia J. Woods
Publication Date7/3/08
SubjectComparative Politics,Gender Studies,Israeli Studies
Pages270


Description 

Uses the case of Israel to examine the circumstances that lead national courts to engage heated political issues.

Patricia J. Woods examines a controversial issue in the politics of many countries around the world: the increasing role that courts and justices have played in deeply charged political battles. Through an extensive case study of the religious-secular conflict in Israel, she argues that the most important determining factor explaining when, why, and how national courts enter into the world of divisive politics is found in the intellectual or judicial communities with whom justices live, work, and think about the law on a daily basis. The interaction among members of this community, Woods maintains, is an organic, sociological process of intellectual exchange that over time culminates in new legal norms that may, through court cases, become binding legal principles. Given the right conditions-electoral democracy, basic judicial independence, and some institutional constraints-courts may use these new legal norms as the basis for a jurisprudence that justifies hearing controversial cases and allows for creative answers to major issues of national political contention.



About the Author 

Patricia J. Woods ---

Patricia J. Woods is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Florida.




Reviews 

"This well-written book makes an important contribution by pushing the analysis of the controversies surrounding judicial intervention/activism to take ideas seriously. It provides a very persuasive account of Israel's High Court of Justice's involvement in religious issues and the key role of the judicial community in precipitating that involvement. At the same time, Woods attends to the roles of institutional factors and social movements in facilitating the controversial rights actions/decisions of the HCJ. This book is a must read for scholars of law and politics." - Austin Sarat, Amherst College

"The author's notion of an extended judicial community of judges, academic lawyers, and cause lawyers is a major move forward in the 'new institutionalism' in the study of law and courts." - Martin Shapiro, Boalt Law School, University of California at Berkeley



 Special Access Code:

 Already viewed books:
Judicial Power and National Politics:Courts and Gender in the Religious-Secular Conflict in IsraelJudicial Power and National Politics:Courts and Gender in the Religious-Secular Conflict in Israel