 |
Bibliographic information
| Title | Victorian Fetishism: Intellectuals and Primitives |
| Author | Peter Melville Logan | | Publisher | SUNY Press |
| Publication Date | 12/18/08 |
| Subject | Cultural Anthropology,Cultural Studies,English Literature, History,History of Science |
| Pages | 221 |
Examines the importance of fetishism in nineteenth-century cultural theory.
Victorian Fetishism argues that fetishism was central to the development of cultural theory in the nineteenth century. From 1850 to 1900, when theories of social evolution reached their peak, European intellectuals identified all "primitive" cultures with "Primitive Fetishism," a psychological form of self-projection in which people believe everything in the external world-thunderstorms, trees, stones-is alive. Placing themselves at the opposite extreme of cultural evolution, the Victorians defined culture not by describing what culture was but by describing what it was not, and what it was not was fetishism. In analyses of major works by Matthew Arnold, George Eliot, and Edward B. Tylor, Peter Melville Logan demonstrates the paradoxical role of fetishism in Victorian cultural theory, namely, how Victorian writers projected their own assumptions about fetishism onto the realm of historical fact, thereby "fetishizing" fetishism. The book concludes by examining how fetishism became a sexual perversion as well as its place within current cultural theory.
|
Peter Melville Logan ---
Peter Melville Logan is Associate Professor of English at Temple University and the author of Nerves and Narratives: A Cultural History of Hysteria in Nineteenth-Century British Prose.
|
"A brilliant analysis of the centrality of fetishism to several Victorian social and humanistic disciplines: literature, anthropology, and psychology. It will surely come to be regarded as the book to read on the subject, as well as one of the most important recent contributions to nineteenth-century cultural analysis." — John Kucich, author of Imperial Masochism: British Fiction, Fantasy, and Social Class
|
| |
|
|
